[X2Go-User] hardware x2go performance relation

[sjomae]

Thanks for the info. And network hardware? The more gb transfer the 
hardware supports, the better or is there a point where it doesn't 
matter much anymore?

On 7/21/24 12:01 PM, Ulrich Sibiller wrote:
> Well,
>
> x2go compresses images using the CPU. So in theory the CPU affects the
> performance. And then you have the cache on disk. As that gets loaded
> on session startup/reconnect a very slow disk will increase the time
> for session startup and also for session suspension/shutdown when the
> cache is stored on disk (which might also happen during the session
> but I have never looked into that).
>
> However, these limitations are more or less theoretical. NX has been
> developed more than 20 years ago so on today's hardware the
> limitations are not relevant.
>
> Uli
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:47 AM sjomae <sjomae at mailbox.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering, what other hardware components besides network
>> hardware, determines the performance of x2go?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> /s
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> x2go-user mailing list
>> x2go-user at lists.x2go.org
>> https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user