[X2Go-User] Compression method guidance

[Tristan Miller]

Greetings.

On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:54:51 +0100 (CET), Walid MOGHRABI
<w.moghrabi at servicemagic.eu> wrote:
> From my own testing, in a LAN setup, I found these settings to be my
> best choices :
> 
> * 16m-jpeg : good overall performances, especially with animated
> contents or videos at the cost of a small artefacts and blurryness
> around small texts
> * 16m-rdp-compressed : good compromise between smoothness and
> readability
> * 16m-png-jpeg : great readability, smoothness is good except for
> animated contents/videos

Do you know what's going on under the hood here or is this just the
results of your own black-box testing?

> The name format is not named from the bpp but from the bandwidth it
> consumes.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other, isn't it?  It takes more
bandwidth to send more bits. (Anyway, in my OP I meant to write
"2^bits_per_pixel", which seems reasonable given that the numbers range
from 8 to 16M.)

Regards,
Tristan

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
                  Tristan Miller
Free Software developer, ferret herder, logologist
             https://logological.org/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/attachments/20170214/01351ddf/attachment.pgp>