[X2Go-User] Questions regarding mate/video quailty

[Robert Dinse]

      I'm not familiar with your client machine but on the server side, build
a kernel with kernel pre-emption enabled, for myself at least it helped
considerably.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
  Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
    Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
  See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.

On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Harald Heigl wrote:

> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 22:01:48 +0200
> From: Harald Heigl <Harald.Heigl1000+x2go at gmail.com>
> To: x2go-user at lists.x2go.org
> Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Questions regarding mate/video quailty
> 
> Hi,
>
> I have still the problem, that running video over x2go (per vlc or
> mates default paroleplayer) is really slow and laggy.
> server: Fedora 22, core2duo, x86, 4.0.1.19
> client: linaro, cubieboard, armhf, 4.0.5.0
>
> - I have testet with another x86 computer as client with no change
> - I have connected the server with the other x86 client directly to
> find out if the network has a problem, with no change
> - I have tried iperf, but the speed of my gigabit lan is fast
> - I have changed the graphiccard of my server (if that changes anything)
>
> I have to admit, that my server is an old core2duo/computer, with old
> radeoncard, ssd and 6GB RAM, but I just want to connect a single user
> from another room inside my home. (and at max one physical user)
> Fedora 22 was set up on the server 2 months ago with a fresh install
> and a lot of packages like libreoffice, 2 browsers, ... . x2goserver
> was set up from the repos.
> Running videos directly on the computer is no problem.
> Are there any limitations or something  I can check (logs, something I
> can try out) or are there any minimum system requirements?
>
> Thanks,
> Harald
>
>
> 2015-08-24 22:30 GMT+02:00 Harald Heigl <Harald.Heigl1000+x2go at gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out. I had x2goserver 4.0.1.19 on fedora and
>> 4.0.1.xx on my client, which seemed to be an old version. I assumed
>> server and client-version belong together. I installed 4.0.5.0 (from
>> ubuntu armhf repos) on the client but had the same difficulties,
>> eventhough it was better and more fluent now.
>> I'll see if I can find another x86 computer and try it from there. I
>> think my client is the problem (or the armhf-packages not 100% the
>> right one for cubieboard).
>> I will need some days to identify the guilty part, I'll write her again.
>>
>> Thanks for all the information,
>> Harald
>>
>> 2015-08-24 19:16 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com>:
>>> On 08/24/2015 06:37 AM, Harald Heigl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the information I just used the
>>>> fedora(server)/linaro(client) included repos and they have both some
>>>> 4.0.1 ...
>>>> Fedora won't be a problem (I can see a x2go-repo in the wiki), I hope
>>>> I find some armel-builds for my cubieboard. any hints? (sometimes
>>>> rasbperry-builds work as well)
>>>>
>>>> I'll test it at home a little bit later and tell you.
>>>
>>> You seem to be mixing client and server versions here a bit.  Fedora has
>>> x2goserver 4.0.1.19 (latest) and x2goclient 4.0.5.0 (latest).  The version
>>> numbers are not linked.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Orion Poplawski
>>> Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
>>> NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
>>> 3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion at nwra.com
>>> Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com
> _______________________________________________
> x2go-user mailing list
> x2go-user at lists.x2go.org
> http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
>