[X2Go-Project] RfC: How should X2Go handle commercial offers/sponsorships and discussions related to that?

[Mike Gabriel]

Hi Stefan,

thanks for putting this on the lists.

On  Di 27 Jan 2015 11:29:14 CET, Stefan Baur wrote:

> This has led to a negative feedback from one of the core team members,
> stating that everything should be public.

This was me. In a phase of change everyone needs to contribute the  
best he/she can to the transparency of ongoing discussions (IMHO).

> We obviously seem to have a different understanding of what "public" can
> mean.  I would have considered a Wiki page public enough.  Seems that
> not everybody agrees.  Now, I don't think either of us is right or
> wrong here, it just shows that one can have a different viewpoint.
>
> So I would like to ask the x2go-dev community at large:
> Are you interested in reading all the gory details regarding sponsored
> development on X2Go, here on this mailing list?
>
> Please choose:
> a1) Yes, please discuss this on x2go-dev

-1

> a2) Yes, please discuss this on x2go-project

+2

> b) Please use a different (new) mailing list dedicated to that purpose

+1

> c) No, please keep the mailing lists a community-only place

-2

> d) I have an entirely different, better solution, namely: ____________



> I will collect your feedback during the next two weeks and will make up
> my mind after that.

Mike#1

-- 

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabriel at das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digitale PGP-Signatur
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-project/attachments/20150127/7c21138a/attachment.pgp>