Joerg<br><br>You just said in one of your responses... <br><br> "<i><b>I am asking for the source for a month or two</b></i>".. <br>Okay...<br><ul><li>Alex was on vacation a month ago.</li><li>Heinz is on vacation now <br>
</li><li>each was 1 month off.</li></ul>I know it was thoughtless of them to take vacations and I'm sorry their responsiveness didn't meet your needs.<br><br>You DO have choices...<br><ol><li>wait until the new x2go is actually released and then see if you can get what you want</li>
<li>go elsewhere and find another solution such as:</li></ol><ul><ul><li>NoMachine's NX v4.0 is do out soon</li><li>FreeNX </li><li>NeatX</li><li>or look into the Spice client & server software from Red Hat.</li></ul>
</ul>Thanks for your comments and opinions but I'm not sure the discussion is very productive at this point<br>and perhaps the forum could go back to answering other questions?<br><br>Brian<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:18 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:x2go-dev-request@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev-request@lists.berlios.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Send X2go-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:x2go-dev-request@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev-request@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:x2go-dev-owner@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev-owner@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of X2go-dev digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: X2go-dev Digest, Vol 21, Issue 18 (J?rg Sawatzki)<br>
2. Re: GPL violations (das.t)<br>
3. Re: GPL violations (J?rg Sawatzki)<br>
4. Re: GPL violations (John A. Sullivan III)<br>
5. Re: Plugin building (Oleksandr Shneyder)<br>
6. Re: Plugin building (John A. Sullivan III)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:02:56 +0200<br>
From: J?rg Sawatzki <<a href="mailto:joerg.sawatzki@web.de">joerg.sawatzki@web.de</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
Subject: Re: [X2go-dev] X2go-dev Digest, Vol 21, Issue 18<br>
Message-ID: <1285189376.3097.408.camel@asus><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"<br>
<br>
They are violating the GPL and the philosphy of OSS for months and you<br>
say: give them a break! Great!<br>
<br>
A lot of people on this list seem to have the opinion that Alex and<br>
Heinz are so great and they work is so valuable that they don't need to<br>
follow law and order today...but maybe tomorrow?<br>
<br>
What would you do if you have asked for sources for months? You won't<br>
say: Oh well, give them a break!<br>
<br>
There is absolutely NO way around it: Even if they were called Barrack<br>
Obama and Bill Gates, they would need to fullfill the requirements of<br>
the license.<br>
<br>
It is sad that lots of people try to find weird reasons why these two<br>
guys don't have to follow the same laws and duties as everybody else<br>
does.<br>
<br>
J?rg<br>
<br>
Am Mittwoch, den 22.09.2010, 16:43 -0400 schrieb brian mullan:<br>
> Joerg<br>
><br>
> I agree with John in his view of Hienz and Alex. They are good folks<br>
> BUT everyone has to remember they are ONLY 2 people !<br>
><br>
> They have a separate life where they have to earn money to support<br>
> themselves & families too.<br>
><br>
> x2go is something they have dedicated themselves to because it aids<br>
> them in their other income related activities.<br>
><br>
> There's an old saying:<br>
><br>
> Nothings impossible for those that<br>
> don't do the work.<br>
><br>
> Given that Heinz and Alex have been working for the past year to<br>
> create this new release of x2go ... again while working on their<br>
> day jobs ... oh, and while building the new x2go wiki etc.<br>
><br>
> Now that they are in what is hoped to be the final stages and frankly<br>
> I'd rather they focus on that and worry about where to post the<br>
> source code when they have some breathing space.<br>
><br>
> Give them a break is my vote.<br>
><br>
> Brian Mullan<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 3<br>
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:51:42 -0400<br>
> From: "John A. Sullivan III" <<a href="mailto:jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com">jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com</a>><br>
> To: <a href="mailto:x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [X2go-dev] GPL violations<br>
> Message-ID: <1285181502.3417.19.camel@localhost><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"<br>
><br>
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 19:47 +0200, J?rg Sawatzki wrote:<br>
> > Hey list,<br>
> ><br>
> > I just got an email back from Heinz - a private mail!<br>
> > You know that I have been discussing about the plugin and<br>
> sources with him and Alex on this list for a couple of months<br>
> now.<br>
> > Other people have asked as well where the sources for the<br>
> plugin are.<br>
> ><br>
> > Obviously they think that I cannot read C++ code and sent me<br>
> the link to the plugin.cpp source<br>
> (<a href="http://x2go.obviously-nice.de/mozplugin/" target="_blank">http://x2go.obviously-nice.de/mozplugin/</a>) again -<br>
> > in the hope that I believe them. But unfortunately I had a<br>
> look into the code (trying to build it) and saw that it<br>
> executes a binary: an extended<br>
> > version of x2goclient with heaps of new command line<br>
> options. Asking for the source (which is your and my right<br>
> according to GPL) I<br>
> > got one of these famous excuses saying "oh, we are in the<br>
> process of changing to QTBrowserPlugin" and so on.<br>
> ><br>
> > In short: 99% of x2goplugin's sources are not published -<br>
> this affects (modified and not modified) third-party<br>
> components as well.<br>
> > Everybody who publically distrubtes GPL software in binary<br>
> form and does NOT provide a link to the sources violates the<br>
> license. The GPL doesn't<br>
> > say "if you have time and the weather is nice you can<br>
> publish the sources if you want to".<br>
> ><br>
> > Therefore I would not recommend anybody to use the plugin in<br>
> a production environment and integrate it into any project! It<br>
> will be you<br>
> > who will get into court if one of your customers enforces<br>
> his GPL rights and you have distributed it in your project.<br>
> ><br>
> > Just to let you know: I feel a bit fooled with all the<br>
> excuses and that they try to somehow get around legal<br>
> requirements by sending me some<br>
> > stuff that's only a 7.5K file wrapping around the actual<br>
> component.<br>
> ><br>
> > In my opinion, the way they deal with community<br>
> input/ideas/contributions is ignorance. Nothing of the critics<br>
> and<br>
> > proposals was taken seriously. We still don't have a GIT<br>
> repo - and that would take them 5 minutes or less!<br>
> > But that's alright - we don't have to have git. But we HAVE<br>
> to follow legal requirements in the GPL. And not next year,<br>
> but NOW!<br>
> ><br>
> > I spent a lot of time and energy into this and the result: I<br>
> am maintaining my own python code externally now, because they<br>
> don't let me<br>
> > contirubte! And the worst result: I am frustrated as hell,<br>
> that I spend months waiting and writing dozens of mails to<br>
> enforce my rights that I<br>
> > have by law.<br>
> ><br>
> > After all, I'd just like to inform all of you, that I am<br>
> going to report this to <a href="http://gpl-violations.org" target="_blank">gpl-violations.org</a> as after explaining<br>
> it again and again I still see no change.<br>
> > I'll inform NoMachine as well and advise them to enforce<br>
> their legal rights as well - it is their code as well!<br>
> ><br>
> > I am sorry for bothering you with this, but I think it is<br>
> important to draw things like this into plubic attention<br>
><br>
><br>
> <snip><br>
><br>
> Hello, Joerg. I've listened to you very patiently on this<br>
> list for a while now because you do contribute and help and<br>
> you are correct about<br>
> the GPL. I, too, am frustrated about the lack of access to all<br>
> the source and the difficulty in finding the source that is<br>
> available<br>
> (although less so than you because I have not had the time<br>
> that I wish I had to look into the sources and contribute<br>
> more).<br>
><br>
> However, I believe you are seriously misreading Heinz (with<br>
> whom I have now worked for a couple of years) and Oleksandr.<br>
> Yes, they should (make<br>
> that "must") publish the code but I also realize they are two<br>
> honest and sincere fellows with full time jobs outside of X2Go<br>
> who have given us an<br>
> enormous project with no significant financial backing of<br>
> which I'm aware. Sometimes there are just not enough hours in<br>
> the day (week,<br>
> month) to get it all done. Perhaps we may disagree with their<br>
> priorities but let's not think there is some malicious, hidden<br>
> agenda.<br>
> Receiving such emails probably does more to make them wonder<br>
> why they ever launched this project than it does to help the<br>
> situation.<br>
><br>
> I am painfully familiar with being a completely overwhelmed<br>
> open source maintainer. Sometimes there is not even enough<br>
> time to enable<br>
> volunteers who are willing to help (set up git, wiki, code,<br>
> etc.) to help. It can just feel completely overwhelming. So<br>
> let's please<br>
> contribute, guide, even positively correct but let's not jump<br>
> up and down on the dev's heads. That doesn't help at all. I'm<br>
> am sincerely<br>
> grateful for what Heinz and Oleksandr have done despite my<br>
> concerns<br>
> which are very close to yours. Peace - John<br>
><br>
> PS - regarding the plugin specifically, I believe they have<br>
> made it clear that the plugin is NOT released. They have<br>
> kindly responded to<br>
> requests for access to the plugin by list members by making it<br>
> available. Perhaps now they wish they had not been so kind<br>
> and kept it<br>
> under wraps until it was ready for release including source.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> X2go-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:04:56 +0200 (CEST)<br>
From: "das.t" <<a href="mailto:tobias@tonstrom.de">tobias@tonstrom.de</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
Subject: Re: [X2go-dev] GPL violations<br>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1009222301200.10671@tobea.knuff.daheim><br>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII<br>
<br>
the developers were so nice and _due_to_great_demand_ to give us a PREVEW<br>
of what is going to come. this was pure generosity. nothing has been<br>
released, this is absolutely inofficial and i am _more_than_sure_ that<br>
we _are_ going to get the source code.<br>
<br>
if you are reading this list you will know that heinz is on vacation, so<br>
there will nothing happen right now. i do not want him to work now as i<br>
know how stressed he is. give him a rest!!!<br>
<br>
if you say x2go is rubish and can be done within minuts - fine, then go<br>
for it. but please do not bug people who are investing more than enough in<br>
oss! especially stop threatening them in this absolutely unnecessarily<br>
rude manner.<br>
<br>
if you think a project is rubish, do something better.<br>
<br>
enough said. i am off this threat now.<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:26:30 +0200<br>
From: J?rg Sawatzki <<a href="mailto:joerg.sawatzki@web.de">joerg.sawatzki@web.de</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
Subject: Re: [X2go-dev] GPL violations<br>
Message-ID: <1285190790.3097.448.camel@asus><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"<br>
<br>
Tobias,<br>
<br>
it is very nice that you want to protect the two.<br>
Oh yes, and I am a stupid idiot who unnecessarily "bugs" people because<br>
he wants to get his right.<br>
I sometimes wonder if we live in a banana republic when people tell me<br>
heaps of reasons why they don't have to follow the law...<br>
<br>
I am asking for the source for a month or two. Taking the build<br>
environment, putting it in a .tar archive and uploading it to a<br>
webserver takes not more than ONE MINUTE and it would absolutely<br>
fullfill the requirements of the GPL and I would never ever have been<br>
complaining. Do I expect too much if I ask him to take ONE MINUTE to<br>
follow the laws and license requirements?<br>
<br>
And btw. I want the code of the plugin that I have downloaded right now.<br>
And not the code of a polished release that comes out next year or so!<br>
I want to submit extensions and bugfixes BEFORE the next release and not<br>
after!<br>
<br>
But thank you for treating me like an idiot just because I fight for my<br>
right.<br>
<br>
<br>
J?rg<br>
<br>
<br>
Am Mittwoch, den 22.09.2010, 23:04 +0200 schrieb das.t:<br>
> the developers were so nice and _due_to_great_demand_ to give us a PREVEW<br>
> of what is going to come. this was pure generosity. nothing has been<br>
> released, this is absolutely inofficial and i am _more_than_sure_ that<br>
> we _are_ going to get the source code.<br>
><br>
> if you are reading this list you will know that heinz is on vacation, so<br>
> there will nothing happen right now. i do not want him to work now as i<br>
> know how stressed he is. give him a rest!!!<br>
><br>
> if you say x2go is rubish and can be done within minuts - fine, then go<br>
> for it. but please do not bug people who are investing more than enough in<br>
> oss! especially stop threatening them in this absolutely unnecessarily<br>
> rude manner.<br>
><br>
> if you think a project is rubish, do something better.<br>
><br>
> enough said. i am off this threat now.<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> X2go-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:01:10 -0400<br>
From: "John A. Sullivan III" <<a href="mailto:jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com">jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
Subject: Re: [X2go-dev] GPL violations<br>
Message-ID: <1285192870.3417.29.camel@localhost><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"<br>
<br>
We're not treating you like an idiot for correctly pointing out the<br>
things that should be done; we are grateful for that. We're treating<br>
you like an idiot for the way you are going about it.<br>
<br>
Yes, they should follow the requirements of the GPL. Yes, they did not<br>
have to accede to the many requests to have access to the plugin before<br>
they were really ready to give either the binaries or the source to<br>
everyone. Yes, they did not have to share any of this project but could<br>
have kept it as a simple in-house project. Given all of of those yeses,<br>
I do eagerly await the release of the source and will wait until it is<br>
released realizing that the delay hurts me but not more than not having<br>
the project at all. In fact, I eagerly await the time when our business<br>
turns cash positive so we can financially support the project. If they<br>
were a corporation making a profit off the backs of open source<br>
developers and hoarding the source code for nefarious reasons, I'd be<br>
far less patient. If you are tired of waiting, go away. Peace - John<br>
<br>
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 23:26 +0200, J?rg Sawatzki wrote:<br>
> Tobias,<br>
><br>
> it is very nice that you want to protect the two.<br>
> Oh yes, and I am a stupid idiot who unnecessarily "bugs" people because<br>
> he wants to get his right.<br>
> I sometimes wonder if we live in a banana republic when people tell me<br>
> heaps of reasons why they don't have to follow the law...<br>
><br>
> I am asking for the source for a month or two. Taking the build<br>
> environment, putting it in a .tar archive and uploading it to a<br>
> webserver takes not more than ONE MINUTE and it would absolutely<br>
> fullfill the requirements of the GPL and I would never ever have been<br>
> complaining. Do I expect too much if I ask him to take ONE MINUTE to<br>
> follow the laws and license requirements?<br>
><br>
> And btw. I want the code of the plugin that I have downloaded right now.<br>
> And not the code of a polished release that comes out next year or so!<br>
> I want to submit extensions and bugfixes BEFORE the next release and not<br>
> after!<br>
><br>
> But thank you for treating me like an idiot just because I fight for my<br>
> right.<br>
><br>
><br>
> J?rg<br>
><br>
><br>
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.09.2010, 23:04 +0200 schrieb das.t:<br>
> > the developers were so nice and _due_to_great_demand_ to give us a PREVEW<br>
> > of what is going to come. this was pure generosity. nothing has been<br>
> > released, this is absolutely inofficial and i am _more_than_sure_ that<br>
> > we _are_ going to get the source code.<br>
> ><br>
> > if you are reading this list you will know that heinz is on vacation, so<br>
> > there will nothing happen right now. i do not want him to work now as i<br>
> > know how stressed he is. give him a rest!!!<br>
> ><br>
> > if you say x2go is rubish and can be done within minuts - fine, then go<br>
> > for it. but please do not bug people who are investing more than enough in<br>
> > oss! especially stop threatening them in this absolutely unnecessarily<br>
> > rude manner.<br>
> ><br>
> > if you think a project is rubish, do something better.<br>
> ><br>
> > enough said. i am off this threat now.<br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > X2go-dev mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> X2go-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 5<br>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:02:26 +0200<br>
From: Oleksandr Shneyder <<a href="mailto:oleksandr.shneyder@obviously-nice.de">oleksandr.shneyder@obviously-nice.de</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
Subject: Re: [X2go-dev] Plugin building<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4C9A7CF2.9030400@obviously-nice.de">4C9A7CF2.9030400@obviously-nice.de</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
J?rg Sawatzki schrieb:<br>
> Hi Heinz, Alex and list,<br>
><br>
<br>
Hello J?rg, list<br>
<br>
Please excuse us, that we cannot answer on all of you e-mails, but we<br>
have a lot of stress with our jobs, vacations and developing new version<br>
of x2go. We will try to answer in this e-mail on some of your questions<br>
that you asked in the mailing list.<br>
<br>
> As you told me some days ago, the plugin source is here:<br>
> <a href="http://x2go.obviously-nice.de/mozplug/" target="_blank">http://x2go.obviously-nice.de/mozplug/</a><br>
><br>
> That is indeed true - but where's the rest of it? As far as I can tell<br>
> from the code, it starts an instance of x2goclient with some "secret"<br>
> command line options. Where is that modified x2goclient's source? It's<br>
> not the 3.01 x2goclient that is floating around around somewhere in<br>
> <a href="http://x2go.obviously-nice.de/deb" target="_blank">x2go.obviously-nice.de/deb</a>, is it?<br>
<br>
There is no "modified x2goclient's source". We have only plugin and<br>
x2goclient which embedding itself in Firefox. You can always download<br>
sources of all software which we developing. All our solutions are open<br>
and we have no secrets from our community. The newest "testing" version<br>
of x2go client(including source code) is here:<br>
<a href="http://x2go.obviously-nice.de/deb/pool-heuler/x2goclient/" target="_blank">http://x2go.obviously-nice.de/deb/pool-heuler/x2goclient/</a><br>
All of that stuff is testing. We working on x2go Plugin based on<br>
QtBrowserPlugin. If we will satisfied with it, there will be only one<br>
source tree for client and plugin.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
here is a small FAQ:<br>
<br>
Q: Where is a source code of X2goclient for Windows?<br>
A: There is a only one source tree of x2goclient for windows, linux and<br>
mac.<br>
<br>
Q: Why x2goclient don't use libssh or shared ssh connection instead of<br>
starting a lot of ssh connections?<br>
A: There are several reasons not to use shared connections. X2go client<br>
starting ssh to run some commands on server. But also x2goclient<br>
starting a couple of ssh-tunnels and reverse ssh-tunnels. All client<br>
ssh-connections have the same options as a master connection. This make<br>
impossible to use shared ssh connections to create reverse tunnels. We<br>
are testing now if libssh can do all this stuff in one connection and<br>
how stable it running on all platforms. If all tests with multiply ssh<br>
tunnels and reverse tunnels running at the same time will be successful,<br>
we will integrate libssh in x2goclient.<br>
<br>
Q: Why x2goclient-cli have not many features of x2goclient, not<br>
finishing all child processes, etc?<br>
A: We have wrote x2goclient-cli only for purposes to testing x2goserver.<br>
Last changes which we made on this package are dated with 15. Sep. 2009.<br>
We have no planes to develop other clients than Qt X2go Client. But I<br>
wish a lot of success to all of your who want to develop other clients<br>
for x2go (for example J?rg with his pyx2go). I only hope that those<br>
clients will stay compatible to x2go. If we have more time, we will help<br>
you with a pleasure. But unfortunately, now we have not enough time even<br>
to comment all e-mails in our mailing list.<br>
<br>
Q: Where is a git ????!!!!!!<br>
A: Coming soon. I promise.<br>
<br>
Q: What is current status of project? What are you doing all this time?<br>
A: A lot of things. We are working hard to make x2go better.<br>
QtBrowserPlugin, windows full screen mode, solving problem with windows<br>
clipboard is our main occupation at this time.<br>
<br>
I hope with this E-mail we have answered on some of your questions.<br>
<br>
Yours sincerely,<br>
Alex and Heinz<br>
<br>
PS:<br>
Ugly English is only from Alex, not from Heinz. I hope you can still<br>
understand all what I have wrote :)<br>
<br>
--<br>
Oleksandr Shneyder<br>
Dipl. Informatik<br>
X2go Core Developer Team<br>
<br>
email: <a href="mailto:oleksandr.shneyder@obviously-nice.de">oleksandr.shneyder@obviously-nice.de</a><br>
web: <a href="http://www.obviously-nice.de" target="_blank">www.obviously-nice.de</a><br>
<br>
--> X2go - everywhere@home<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 260 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
URL: <<a href="https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/x2go-dev/attachments/20100923/fac519bf/attachment-0001.pgp" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/x2go-dev/attachments/20100923/fac519bf/attachment-0001.pgp</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 6<br>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:18:09 -0400<br>
From: "John A. Sullivan III" <<a href="mailto:jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com">jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
Subject: Re: [X2go-dev] Plugin building<br>
Message-ID: <1285193889.3417.32.camel@localhost><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 00:02 +0200, Oleksandr Shneyder wrote:<br>
> <snip><br>
<br>
> Q: What is current status of project? What are you doing all this time?<br>
> A: A lot of things. We are working hard to make x2go better.<br>
> QtBrowserPlugin, windows full screen mode, solving problem with windows<br>
> clipboard is our main occupation at this time.<br>
<snip><br>
A multi-browser client (QtBrowserPlugin), Windows full screen and<br>
clipboard are extremely high priorities for my company. Thank you for<br>
focusing there - John<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
X2go-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de">X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of X2go-dev Digest, Vol 21, Issue 20<br>
****************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br>