[X2Go-Dev] Different behavior of X2Go Client from Desktop and TCE

[Stefan Baur]

Am 18.05.2018 um 10:32 schrieb Oleksandr Shneyder:
> NFS-based TCE has a lot of advantages and will be kept anyway.
... as long as someone is actively maintaining it.  If you have
customers paying for it, or you volunteer to maintain it, fine.

But I'm not happy with keeping a TCE-NFS in git that works on, say,
Debian 9 only, when Debian 10 or 11 becomes/is the stable release.

I'm curious to learn about the "lot of advantages" of TCE-NFS.  Go ahead
and list them, please, so we can put them in the Wiki and create a
side-by-side comparison between TCE-NFS and TCE-Live as a guide for
potential users, so they know which version is right for them.

My personal experience with TCE-NFS was horrifying, that's why I started
TCE-Live.  But maybe it is just a serious lack of documentation of
TCE-NFS that made Debian-Live feel way easier to me ...

Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur

-- 
BAUR-ITCS UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Baur
Eichenäckerweg 10, 89081 Ulm | Registergericht Ulm, HRB 724364
Fon/Fax 0731 40 34 66-36/-35 | USt-IdNr.: DE268653243

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-dev/attachments/20180518/3785d3af/attachment.sig>