[X2Go-Dev] Mozjpeg 2.0 might be worth using for X2Go

[Michael DePaulo]

Good point, thank you.

X2Go's performance over WAN is mainly limited by latency, not
bandwidth. (Although nx-libs makes a huge improvement over X11 when it
comes to handling latency.) So mozjpeg compression probably isn't
worth trying to add as an optional mode.

-Mike#2

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Ulrich Sibiller
<u.sibiller at science-computing.de> wrote:
> Am 16.07.2014 15:08, schrieb Michael DePaulo:
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTc0MjE
>
>
> According to this link http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/About/Mozjpeg it needs a
> lot more CPU for a slight improvement in size, on both sides. So it does not
> work as a general replacement. It might help, though, for very thin network
> connections.
>
> Uli
> --
> Vorstandsvorsitzender/Chairman of the board of management:
> Gerd-Lothar Leonhart
> Vorstand/Board of Management:
> Dr. Bernd Finkbeiner, Michael Heinrichs, Dr. Arno Steitz
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/
> Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
> Philippe Miltin
> Sitz/Registered Office: Tuebingen
> Registergericht/Registration Court: Stuttgart
> Registernummer/Commercial Register No.: HRB 382196
> _______________________________________________
> x2go-dev mailing list
> x2go-dev at lists.x2go.org
> http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-dev