I'm not familiar with your client machine but on the server side, builda kernel with kernel pre-emption enabled, for myself at least it helped considerably.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Harald Heigl wrote:
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 22:01:48 +0200 From: Harald Heigl <Harald.Heigl1000+x2go@gmail.com> To: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Questions regarding mate/video quailty
Hi,
I have still the problem, that running video over x2go (per vlc or mates default paroleplayer) is really slow and laggy. server: Fedora 22, core2duo, x86, 4.0.1.19 client: linaro, cubieboard, armhf, 4.0.5.0
- I have testet with another x86 computer as client with no change
- I have connected the server with the other x86 client directly to find out if the network has a problem, with no change
- I have tried iperf, but the speed of my gigabit lan is fast
- I have changed the graphiccard of my server (if that changes anything)
I have to admit, that my server is an old core2duo/computer, with old radeoncard, ssd and 6GB RAM, but I just want to connect a single user from another room inside my home. (and at max one physical user) Fedora 22 was set up on the server 2 months ago with a fresh install and a lot of packages like libreoffice, 2 browsers, ... . x2goserver was set up from the repos. Running videos directly on the computer is no problem. Are there any limitations or something I can check (logs, something I can try out) or are there any minimum system requirements?
Thanks, Harald
2015-08-24 22:30 GMT+02:00 Harald Heigl <Harald.Heigl1000+x2go@gmail.com>:
Hi,
Thanks for pointing this out. I had x2goserver 4.0.1.19 on fedora and 4.0.1.xx on my client, which seemed to be an old version. I assumed server and client-version belong together. I installed 4.0.5.0 (from ubuntu armhf repos) on the client but had the same difficulties, eventhough it was better and more fluent now. I'll see if I can find another x86 computer and try it from there. I think my client is the problem (or the armhf-packages not 100% the right one for cubieboard). I will need some days to identify the guilty part, I'll write her again.
Thanks for all the information, Harald
2015-08-24 19:16 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com>:
On 08/24/2015 06:37 AM, Harald Heigl wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the information I just used the fedora(server)/linaro(client) included repos and they have both some 4.0.1 ... Fedora won't be a problem (I can see a x2go-repo in the wiki), I hope I find some armel-builds for my cubieboard. any hints? (sometimes rasbperry-builds work as well)
I'll test it at home a little bit later and tell you.
You seem to be mixing client and server versions here a bit. Fedora has x2goserver 4.0.1.19 (latest) and x2goclient 4.0.5.0 (latest). The version numbers are not linked.
-- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
x2go-user mailing list x2go-user@lists.x2go.org http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user