14 Feb
2017
14 Feb
'17
8:14 p.m.
Greetings.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:54:51 +0100 (CET), Walid MOGHRABI <w.moghrabi@servicemagic.eu> wrote:
From my own testing, in a LAN setup, I found these settings to be my best choices :
- 16m-jpeg : good overall performances, especially with animated contents or videos at the cost of a small artefacts and blurryness around small texts
- 16m-rdp-compressed : good compromise between smoothness and readability
- 16m-png-jpeg : great readability, smoothness is good except for animated contents/videos
Do you know what's going on under the hood here or is this just the results of your own black-box testing?
The name format is not named from the bpp but from the bandwidth it consumes.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other, isn't it? It takes more bandwidth to send more bits. (Anyway, in my OP I meant to write "2^bits_per_pixel", which seems reasonable given that the numbers range from 8 to 16M.)
Regards, Tristan
--
Tristan Miller