Hi,
I don't think, that the client is the problem, cause I tested also a second x86-fedora22-client with exactly the same result, so I expect the server is the problem. I've asked at fedoraforum cause of preemptive kernel and they say the standard is still preemptive.
With nomachine 4.0 video is much better (even if not 100%), but with nomachine I can't use virtual desktop for free.
Any other suggestion? Server requirements, ... ?
Thanks, Harald
Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com> schrieb am So., 6. Sep. 2015 22:06:
I'm not familiar with your client machine but on the server side,build a kernel with kernel pre-emption enabled, for myself at least it helped considerably.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Harald Heigl wrote:
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 22:01:48 +0200 From: Harald Heigl <Harald.Heigl1000+x2go@gmail.com> To: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Questions regarding mate/video quailty
Hi,
I have still the problem, that running video over x2go (per vlc or mates default paroleplayer) is really slow and laggy. server: Fedora 22, core2duo, x86, 4.0.1.19 client: linaro, cubieboard, armhf, 4.0.5.0
- I have testet with another x86 computer as client with no change
- I have connected the server with the other x86 client directly to find out if the network has a problem, with no change
- I have tried iperf, but the speed of my gigabit lan is fast
- I have changed the graphiccard of my server (if that changes anything)
I have to admit, that my server is an old core2duo/computer, with old radeoncard, ssd and 6GB RAM, but I just want to connect a single user from another room inside my home. (and at max one physical user) Fedora 22 was set up on the server 2 months ago with a fresh install and a lot of packages like libreoffice, 2 browsers, ... . x2goserver was set up from the repos. Running videos directly on the computer is no problem. Are there any limitations or something I can check (logs, something I can try out) or are there any minimum system requirements?
Thanks, Harald
2015-08-24 22:30 GMT+02:00 Harald Heigl <Harald.Heigl1000+x2go@gmail.com :
Hi,
Thanks for pointing this out. I had x2goserver 4.0.1.19 on fedora and 4.0.1.xx on my client, which seemed to be an old version. I assumed server and client-version belong together. I installed 4.0.5.0 (from ubuntu armhf repos) on the client but had the same difficulties, eventhough it was better and more fluent now. I'll see if I can find another x86 computer and try it from there. I think my client is the problem (or the armhf-packages not 100% the right one for cubieboard). I will need some days to identify the guilty part, I'll write her again.
Thanks for all the information, Harald
2015-08-24 19:16 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com>:
On 08/24/2015 06:37 AM, Harald Heigl wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the information I just used the fedora(server)/linaro(client) included repos and they have both some 4.0.1 ... Fedora won't be a problem (I can see a x2go-repo in the wiki), I hope I find some armel-builds for my cubieboard. any hints? (sometimes rasbperry-builds work as well)
I'll test it at home a little bit later and tell you.
You seem to be mixing client and server versions here a bit. Fedora has x2goserver 4.0.1.19 (latest) and x2goclient 4.0.5.0 (latest). The version numbers are not linked.
-- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
x2go-user mailing list x2go-user@lists.x2go.org http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user