Ignore my last message. I see problem is with my sources directorystill having stuff for vivid instead of wiley.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Robert Dinse wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:58:47 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com> To: "[utf-8] ukasz Czerpak" <lukasz.czerpak@gmail.com> Cc: Stefan Seidel <sseidel@vub.de>, x2go-user@lists.x2go.org Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] X2Go speed (Gb LAN) vs. pure X
I am curious what desktop environment people having problems are using?I use Mate pretty much exclusively so maybe it's an issue with a different desktop, or maybe one of server resources, although my workstation is antique my servers are modern i7-6700k systems maxed out on RAM (64GB).
The only time I experience any issues if I stream 1024p mediafullscreen, and then it's only an occasional stutter.
I am anxious to try the adaptive option but I am running vivid and therepository for nightly builds is only for debian / jessie. Is there a repository for nightly builds for vivid vervit?
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, ukasz Czerpak wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:45:00 +0100 From: "[utf-8] ukasz Czerpak" <lukasz.czerpak@gmail.com> To: Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com> Cc: Stefan Seidel <sseidel@vub.de>, x2go-user@lists.x2go.org Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] X2Go speed (Gb LAN) vs. pure X
That's a good question - maybe the problem is not x2go at all. Anyway, I found 'adaptive' working better in multi-user environment and more responsive in both single- and multi-user environments. Most of my testing was done using Ubuntu as server (within VM - Parallels Desktop). But my customers have also tested in real and found 'adaptive' behaving better. IMHO worth trying at least.
ukasz
On 01 Feb 2016, at 18:21, Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com> wrote:
I don't understand why he is having this problem, when I, with only a100mb/s LAN and a 20mb/s Comcast cable connection to my servers, and an antique Power Mac 1.1, am not.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, ukasz Czerpak wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:17:56 +0100 From: "[utf-8] ukasz Czerpak" <lukasz.czerpak@gmail.com> To: Stefan Seidel <sseidel@vub.de> Cc: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] X2Go speed (Gb LAN) vs. pure X Hi,
Have you tried 'adaptive' method with image compression set to ~7? Stable versions of X2Go client may not support this yet, so you'd need to use Nightly Builds. It improved user experience significantly - none of other methods worked so smoothly.
Best regards, ukasz
On 14 Jan 2016, at 16:12, Stefan Seidel <sseidel@vub.de> wrote:
Hi,
I am currently testing X2Go to be a replacement for our (1GBit/s) LAN XDMCP setup. I have set up a Jessie X2Go-PXE server VM with a Jessie chroot env.
It is working in principle, I can get a connection and the advantage of session suspend/resume is great. (Although I had to remove the pulseaudio startup from the x2gosessiond to make it work.)
However, I have two problems: then xrandr) and connect, the X session only sees one "big" screen.
- How can I set client-specific X11 options? We have clients with complex multi-monitor setups. Xinerama doesn't seem to be working, either, once I have set the screens on the client (using Ctrl+Alt+F1,
- Speed: for small screen updates (menu items etc.) - I would guess < 10k pixels - X2Go is very speedy and responsive. For anything larger (Google Chrome being a serious offender, as it always updates the whole rendering area) it is much slower. Even just scrolling in Firefox is "laggy". Pure X is much faster for these large screen updates. I have tried various settings, 4k-jpeg is almost acceptable speed-wise but still not fast enough.
Test setup: X2Go-Server: Core i7-860 (4x2.8GHz), 24G RAM X2Go-PXE: VM with 4GHz AMD, 2G RAM Clients: Pentium D 2.8GHz, 512MB RAM, nVidia Dual-DVI graphics (model 6200 IIRC) with 2 1600x1200 monitors -> 2400x1600 total screen area. Clients use NOUVEAU and report Chipset: "NVIDIA NV44"
Thanks in advance for any hints,
Stefan
x2go-user mailing list x2go-user@lists.x2go.org <mailto:x2go-user@lists.x2go.org> http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user <http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user>