Hi Nirav,
On Sa 23 Nov 2013 22:47:23 CET, Nirav Shah wrote:
Thanks Steve and Mike for the guidance you have provided. I really appreciate your help.
My servers are available in California and the developers are working in Europe and in India. So the ping time varies from 150 ms to 400 ms. I have selected ADSL with 16m-jpeg connection. The developers are accessing Linux environment with GNome. They use some Java 2D graphics for the development. Their normal bandwidth (tested using Speedtest.net) is around 3-5 MBPS.
The replies from Mike and Steve, I understood that for this kind of high latency I should use "WAN" connection speed with compression method - "No Pack". Is this my understanding correct?
I am really not an expert on this, but you could try that (maybe not
,,No Pack''). On IRC there is a guy called "TheUser". Ask him about
that question once he appears again. He had another WAN based
recommendation that I forgot again.
Using speed = LAN is identical to normal X11 over SSH.
I have already set Image quality to 1 and disabled audio/print/shared folder support.
I have also used libjpeg-turbo library on the server side (Linux OS).
You should have libjpeg-turbo on the client, as well. But for this you
need an nxproxy that uses the compat libs from libjpeg-turbo. If you
build statically, then you need to build against libjpeg-turbo directly.
Will this kind of setup work? If I upgrade hardware on my server/client, will it make any difference? Can X2go handle this kind of latency issues with some settings? Is there any minimum bandwidth required with this latency?
All good questions that I do not have an experienced answer for. I
only know that several other people have struggled with this.
Mike
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148
GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de
freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xf...