Hi Stefan,
On Do 07 Mai 2020 10:38:11 CEST, Stefan Baur wrote:
Am 07.05.20 um 10:35 schrieb Mike Gabriel:
Again, that sounds nice as an add-on, but basic NX support in an HTML5 client should take priority. After all, that's what our sponsors asked for - and not a broker-/multi-server DMZ solution. It's fine to design the solution with a possible broker-add-on in mind, but please don't focus on the broker more than on the NX support.
Why stick to the NX support, if we have a native graphical backend
that's html5 compliant.
The NX -> x11vnc -> NoVNC solution will always be worse (slower, more
itchy and glitchy).
(and: it should not be a big deal to implement it once we have the web
framework around it).
Mike
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM c\o Technik- und Ökologiezentrum Eckernförde Mike Gabriel, Marienthaler Str. 17, 24340 Eckernförde mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148 landline: +49 (4351) 850 8940
GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de