I understand that using a cloud server still involves some cpu sharing but I was interested in whether it would "help".   I do know I can try the same using dedicated servers it will just cost a little more per hour but I can see about trying it next.

On Apr 6, 2015 5:07 PM, "Robert Dinse" <nanook@eskimo.com> wrote:

     That would certainly eliminate issues with hypervisor latency. Unfortunately, I don't have the resources to do bare metal server testing at this point, but client is bare metal.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
 Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
   Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
 See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:

Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:57:23 +0000
From: Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>
To: Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com>
Cc: brian mullan <bmullan.mail@gmail.com>, x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Jerky Video Fixed

Hi Brian, hi Robert,

On  Mo 06 Apr 2015 17:39:01 CEST, Robert Dinse wrote:

I don't know enough about their cloud servers to know what else to look
at, you're giving your low latency kernel CPU cycles from a cloud, how choppy
is the scheduling of CPU cycles to your kernel fro the cloud?  Your kernel
can't schedual CPU cycles during times it doesn't have them.


I also think that testing with low latency should be from bare metal (server) to bare metal (client).

Greets,
Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb