Hi,
From my own testing, in a LAN setup, I found these settings to be my best choices :
The name format is not named from the bpp but from the bandwidth it consumes. For your use case, with mostly text based apps, I would recommend 2m-png-jpeg, should be good.
Regards, Walid Moghrabi
TRAVAUX.COM BAT I - PARC CEZANNE 2 290 AVENUE GALILEE - CS 80403 13591 AIX EN PROVENCE CEDEX 3
----- Mail original -----
De: "Tristan Miller" <psychonaut@nothingisreal.com> À: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Février 2017 11:15:28 Objet: [X2Go-User] Compression method guidance
Dear all,
X2Go supports an awful lot of different compression methods. Is there any guidance available for which compression methods work best in which scenarios? I didn't see anything on the X2Go wiki but it's possible I've overlooked it. I can't even find a description of what all the different compression methods actually are, though I'm guessing that most of them are named in the format bits_per_pixel-image_compression_algorithm.
For my own use, I usually use X2Go to run individual applications (not an entire desktop) remotely. These applications are primarily text-based, such as terminal emulators, text editors, and mail clients. The remote machines have upload speeds of about 3 Mbit/s. Would it make sense for me to choose something png-based rather than jpeg-based? 256-png perhaps, since I am not looking at any images other than toolbar icons?
Regards, Tristan
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is private and confidential and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information. It is for the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the author by replying to it and then destroy it. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail or any attachment. Thank you