Dear Orion,
Aha! Now I see that there is also real EPEL build by you! No wonder I confused people with my explanation. Sorry about that. :-)
Should I drop the "EPEL" build and just use EPEL one, as the version seem to be roughly the same?
-- Grigory Shamov
HPC Analyst, Tech. Site Lead, Westgrid/Compute Canada E2-588 EITC Building, University of Manitoba (204) 474-9625
On 14-08-26 4:47 PM, "Orion Poplawski" <orion@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
On 08/26/2014 03:05 PM, Grigory Shamov wrote:
Dear Les,
Thank you for your always helpful answers.
"Manual" means wget + rpm -i. Only x2go "EPEL" repo was enabled. There are two x2go repos, one "EPEL" and one "SUSE Open Factory" (you may want to visit the link I provided). So I call it "EPEL" to distinguish from the "SUSE Open Factory".
There is also EPEL EPEL, a RedHat/Fedora project which has nothing to do with x2go besides providing the dependencies for "EPEL" build of it. I did not enable the EPEL repo. If dependencies in x2go rpms that are in "EPEL" build are correct, they should tell me, what rpms do I miss. Then I install missing ones manually. As described above.
I have 4.0.1.15 that is in the "EPEL" x2go repo.
Yeah, this is what I was afraid would happen with the use of EPEL everywhere on the X2Go site.
Basically, follow the "using EPEL" link and just install from there. I've tried to tweak the wiki to make this clearer.
-- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com