Пн. 30 сент. 2013 13:49:01 пользователь Mike Gabriel (mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de) wrote:
are you willing to provide a patch? Otherwise, I will mark this reported issue as "won't fix" for now.
Mike
OK, I didn't plan to do it, but if you want... Propose patch which fixes 3 evident bugs: 1 implicit function declaration and 2 array index out of bounds. I agree "[-Waddress]" warnings are not so terrible and may be that code helps to avoid future mistakes. What about warnings in get.c: I don't know what to do.
Hi Mirraz,
On Mo 30 Sep 2013 16:03:44 CEST, Mirraz Mirraz wrote:
Пн. 30 сент. 2013 13:49:01 пользователь Mike Gabriel
(mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de) wrote:are you willing to provide a patch? Otherwise, I will mark this reported issue as "won't fix" for now.
Mike
OK, I didn't plan to do it, but if you want... Propose patch which fixes 3 evident bugs: 1 implicit function
declaration and 2 array index out of bounds. I agree "[-Waddress]" warnings are not so terrible and may be that
code helps to avoid future mistakes. What about warnings in get.c: I don't know what to do.
thanks for that patched. As you might have noticed, I have applied the
patch to nx-libs.git and it will be in 3.5.0.22.
However, do you consider this issue (#314) to be fixed? I have no
spontaneous clue on the get.c issue, would have to sit down to find a
solution.
Maybe someone else (Orion?) has an idea...
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148
GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de
freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xf...