Don't see much advantages either except the fact that it lets you easily change some settings live without a reboot needed to start a new image.
But to be honest, as far as I'm concerned, I see more drawbacks in TCE-NFS than in TCE-Live.
Regards, Walid Moghrabi
TRAVAUX.COM BAT I - PARC CEZANNE 2 290 AVENUE GALILEE - CS 80403 13591 AIX EN PROVENCE CEDEX 3
----- Mail original -----
De: "Stefan Baur" <X2Go-ML-1@baur-itcs.de> À: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Mai 2018 10:43:16 Objet: Re: [X2Go-Dev] Different behavior of X2Go Client from Desktop and TCE
Am 18.05.2018 um 10:32 schrieb Oleksandr Shneyder:
NFS-based TCE has a lot of advantages and will be kept anyway. ... as long as someone is actively maintaining it. If you have customers paying for it, or you volunteer to maintain it, fine.
But I'm not happy with keeping a TCE-NFS in git that works on, say, Debian 9 only, when Debian 10 or 11 becomes/is the stable release.
I'm curious to learn about the "lot of advantages" of TCE-NFS. Go ahead and list them, please, so we can put them in the Wiki and create a side-by-side comparison between TCE-NFS and TCE-Live as a guide for potential users, so they know which version is right for them.
My personal experience with TCE-NFS was horrifying, that's why I started TCE-Live. But maybe it is just a serious lack of documentation of TCE-NFS that made Debian-Live feel way easier to me ...
Kind Regards, Stefan Baur
-- BAUR-ITCS UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Geschäftsführer: Stefan Baur Eichenäckerweg 10, 89081 Ulm | Registergericht Ulm, HRB 724364 Fon/Fax 0731 40 34 66-36/-35 | USt-IdNr.: DE268653243
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is private and confidential and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information. It is for the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the author by replying to it and then destroy it. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail or any attachment. Thank you