Hi Stefan,
On Mo 30 Jan 2012 18:37:40 CET "newsgroups.mail2@stefanbaur.de" wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 00:46, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
From my point of view it is indeed not necessary to recompile NX to
be used with libjpeg-turbo. People may correct me if that is not
true.So for a running X2Go server and client you can drop in
on squeeze: apt-get install libjpeg-turbo62 on wheezy, sid: apt-get install libjpeg-turbo8
And your host should then run with libjpeg-turbo instead of
libjpeg. Please note, that this change affects every application on
that system. So... no warranty given from our side. Also, if
testing libjpeg-turbo, please read the documentation of
libjpeg-turbo:Guys,
it would be really helpful if someone could type up a step-by-step
guide for testing.
I'd love to try this out, but either I *did* something wrong or
something *goes* wrong, as the following had no positive effect
whatsoever:
- add heuler repository, apt-get update
- apt-get install libjpeg-turbo62 on my squeeze-based server
- connect from latest Microsoft Windows client to said server
- use Iceweasel in rootless mode, access YouTube and watch a movie
What compression do you use? 16m-jpeg-9?
The only effect I saw was a "screen hang" when leaving YouTube for
another web site, and no speed increase whatsoever. :-(
hmmm...
- Will this currently only work between Linux Clients and Linux Servers?
jpeg compression is performed on both sides: client _and_ server, I
guess. It can have an effect on both sides (I guess).
- Will it work with rootless sessions? (I remember NoMachine/FreeNX
once stated that rootless sessions in general - i.e. not related to
libjpeg-turbo - gain less speed than a fullscreen session - but that
was years ago and may have changed and may not apply to X2Go at all,
I don't know.)
It should...
- Is the library required on both the server *and* on the client?
Best performance is achieved if it is installed on both: server and
client. But it can be installed on either, only.
- Should it work "out of the box" after installing the package, or
do I have to change some file somewhere to add the library path?
out-of-the-box, by theory... However, we should compare a drop-in of
the package into an already running server with an NX (redistributed)
compiled on a system where libjpeg-turbo is installed during package
build. Not sure if that changes performance gain...
- Do I have to restart a daemon after changing this file?
No daemons involved here, at all.
- Why was I able to install the package without apt-get telling me
it would remove the "non-turbo" library package? To make this clear,
I don't complain about a lack of a warning (Mike did provide such a
warning in his posting), but I'm surprised about the lack of
*action* i.e. no library package has been removed when I installed
the libjpeg-turbo62 package.
Please read more about dpkg-divert: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/118
And refer to the postrm and preinst scripts of libjpeg-turbo: http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=tree;f=debian
Kind Regards, Stefan
Greets, Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419
GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de
freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xf...