Hi all,
On Do 11 Aug 2011 10:37:12 CEST Moritz Struebe wrote:
On 2011-08-11 10:31, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:20:18 (CEST), Moritz Struebe wrote:
Hi there,
here is a small patch for the x2goclient-man-page. The wording is a bit different to the help of the client itself. Is it reasonable to reuse the output of man for the application? That way there is no need to keep the documentation in sync. The other way round seems easier to me: change x2goclient's --help output to be parsable by help2man(1), and generate the manpage from this.
Sounds good to me. Especially formatting man-pages sucks! Extracting documentation to a text-file and including that file into the binary shouldn't be to difficult. That would simplify maintaining the documentation and provide a stronger separation of concerns. @Alex: Any opinion on this?
I personally do not like the idea of deriving a man page from command
output. I expect a command output to be really short and give info in
a nutshell.
For simple tools like the GNU tools the help2man tool is very neat.
From a man page for a software like X2go, however, I expect some more
infos than those presented on ,,x2goclient --help'', esp. in the
examples section of the man page. To my point of view, we should keep
this separate and improve the x2goclient man page manually.
Greets, Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419
GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de
freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xf...