On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 10:39 +0200, Moritz Struebe wrote:
On 2011-09-03 10:49, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
That would ultimately be hundreds to tens of thousands of CUPS processes running which would not have to be if they could be fed by a single CUPS server. That's why we originally hacked the x2goprint solution to support multiple x2goservers.
2.2MB in Memory on our system (/proc/<PID>/status - see "man proc"). IMO there are far better ways of saving RAM - e.g. using a different window manager may save a multitude of this.
<snip> But it's not just about RAM. There is CPU consumption. There is another unneeded service running which creates a possible security exposure. It means hundreds of systems to upgrade and manage instead of one. One is almost always easier, safer, and less expensive to manage than hundreds - at least in my management experience - John