Hello Stefan,
well, in real world I would never use LAN as a setting, even on LAN i would use WAN as the primary setting. We've benchmarked it, and without access to the benchmarks right now (you should find them in some article by Harald Milz in the german issue of the linux magazine some months ago) I can only say: You'd have it better that way. I would recommend you to use jpeg compression in combination with libjpegturbo, since this makes a real difference - especially on modern netbooks since their processor speed is not the best but in combination with the SSE-instruction sets which are used for libjpegturbo this makes a major performance boost (up to 3x in my lab tests).
But: please tell us: what glitches do you suffer? What settings are you using?
An upgrade to Gigabit will not help you much IMHO, since one session and 100 Mbit is far more than enough. The only point where you could have fun with is with lower latency times - but a dedicated 100 mbit with not too much traffic should be a low latency line anyways ...
- mike
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: newsgroups.mail2@stefanbaur.de Gesendet: Di 21.02.2012 20:27 Betreff: [X2Go-Dev] Preferred settings for X2go LAN use An: x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de;
Hi everyone,
any recommendations on what settings I should use in X2go-Client when the server is on the same LAN as the clients, and I want to watch youtube (with Pulseaudio sound) via X2Go? The default settings already look (and sound) promising, but it seems there are a few glitches... and I'm wondering if they are real bugs or just side effects of a less-than-ideal session setting.
I'm currently using a 100MBit switched LAN, with the option to upgrade to 1 GBit LAN if that would make a major difference.
-Stefan
X2Go-Dev mailing list X2Go-Dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev