Hi Morty,
On Mo 21 Mär 2011 08:52:04 CET Moritz Struebe wrote:
On 2011-03-20 16:01, Mike Gabriel wrote:
The right way of doing this, would be to the learn about Linux system administration and use the sufficient tools already provided to you (e.g. ACLs). Everything else creates false feeling of security.
What exactly are you aiming at?
I am aiming at x2go-client/server being the wrong place to do rights management. IMO if someone tires to start an x2go session, who is not allowed to do so, should fail starting the server and get a notice of this. I don't see any reason for handshaking, unless this has something to do with x2go. And IMO rights management isn't.
But that's my opinion.
I share your opinion. So there are two parts of such a feature...
Would apparmor be one way to go? Do you already have a clearer idea
how you would tighten up a system?
Greets, Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419
GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de
freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xf...