Hi list,
I would suggest moving the bug reports to a new mailing list, if that is
technically possible, say, one named x2go-bugs.
That way, x2go-dev would be available for discussions regarding further
development, "is-this-a-bug-or-am-I-doing-it-wrong", feature
enhancements etc. and x2go-bugs would be for the bug-tracking grunt work.
General ideas:
posting a bug, please check <web page of bugtracker or web page of
- Every coder should subscribe to x2go-bugs as well.
- Feature requests that have been agreed upon on x2go-dev should be CCed
to x2go-bugs *by the coder willing to pick up the task* to avoid dupes.
- Using two different lists will make it easier for list-newbies on
x2go-dev that may not yet know how to properly set up a filter rule
(central vs. individual administration).
- Cross-posting bug reports from the bug-hunting mailing list to
x2go-dev will be allowed/tolerated for a limited amount of time until we
can be sure all the relevant developers are subscribed to x2go-bugs (or
whatever name we'll end up with).
- The automatic signature on x2go-dev should be amended with "before
x2go-bugs ML archive> if your problem is already known.".
the more experienced list members (preferably one of the devs) should
- Should an inexperienced list member post a new bug on x2go-dev, one of
pick it up and reply with a message like "added to tracker, id is <foo>,
see <link to Tracker/ML archive)>, thanks for reporting the issue."
- A similar approach would be in order for already known bugs, WONTFIXes
etc.
Comments, anyone?
-Stefan