[X2Go-User] Latency Issues

[Nirav Shah]

Java graphics are not that complex but it has run time debugging features
which is performing(or displaying) very slow when we use x2go client.  Is
it possible to use Nxclient with X2go server? I am fine with that too. I
have tried to use NXServer but I found it difficult to install/configure
compared to X2go server.

I am going to try all the options if I am able to test different latency on
my machine. I tried with Charles but somehow, it was not giving me the
proper result of latency after configuring it.


On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Steve Bergman <sbergman27 at gmail.com> wrote:

> It's hard to get around the cold hard fact that a 400ms round trip time
> means that nothing that requires talking to the server can happen in less
> than 400ms, which is nearly half a second. (Consider that Einstein,
> himself, is imposing at least 50ms of that latency upon you from the grave.)
>
> How large/complex are these java graphics? The NoMachine NX client has
> controls for both RAM and on-disk caches. The RAM cache is configurable
> from 4MB to 128M. And the on-disk cache is configurable from 0MB to 512MB.
> Depending upon the exact workload, large caches may help. But I'm not sure
> how to set that in x2go. (What does the '16m' in '16m-jpeg' actually mean,
> I wonder? 16m RAM cache? Something else?)
>
> Regarding trying out 'LAN', I can tell you right now that's going to
> perform *extremely* badly. I'd have a lot more hope for 'WAN'. My best
> *guess* is that ADSL *may* be your best bet. But do try everything and see
> what works best.
>
> -Steve
>



-- 
Thanks,

Nirav Shah
(C) (412) 296-9491
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/attachments/20131123/d7c58c14/attachment.html>