[X2go-user] LDAP-Problem: Zertifikateproblem

[Mike Gabriel]

Hi Mike,

On Mi 23 Mär 2011 14:21:12 CET  wrote:

> Yes, I know that LDAP is not absolutely necessary. I am using x2go    
> already that way. This is to make a test installation for a    
> presentation of the software with the option of using it for a    
> company, so LDAP is an option. I would like to use it, but I am not   
>  experienced with LDAP yet myself and the one who is experienced    
> proposes NX.
> Plus one can only gain experiences.

Do you want to use the load balancing support of X2go/LDAP? Or do you   
  just want to administrate users in LDAP.

For the latter, I personally recommend setting up your LDAP tree    
manually (there are plenty of howtos in the web for this...). For    
learning LDAP this should be your way to go. Then make sure you can    
use LDAP as libnss and pam source for passwd, group, shadow. At last    
you have to make sure that LDAP users are in the x2gousers group    
(which can be local or also a group in LDAP).

Once you have that, LDAP users can login via X2go.

[Once you have such a simple LDAP DIT up and running you might want to  
   start from scratch and set up an LDAP-server that gets administered  
  by  GOsa² or CIPUX ;-) ...]

If you want to use load balancing with X2go, then this should also be   
  possible manually, but basically that's what the scripts were  
intended   for (they were also intended for easy LDAP-setup, but you  
can do  this  manually...). However, to my personal view, the LDAP   
implementation  needs quite some work before the Baikal release and   
also needs proper  documentation of the way LDAP data is used and   
interpreted...

Maybe someone else has experience on LDAP/loadbalancing...

Greets,
Mike


-- 

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen
fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419

GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B
mail: mike.gabriel at das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
-------------- next part --------------
Hi Mike,

On Mi 23 Mär 2011 14:21:12 CET  wrote:

> Yes, I know that LDAP is not absolutely necessary. I am using x2go   
> already that way. This is to make a test installation for a   
> presentation of the software with the option of using it for a   
> company, so LDAP is an option. I would like to use it, but I am not   
> experienced with LDAP yet myself and the one who is experienced   
> proposes NX.
> Plus one can only gain experiences.

Do you want to use the load balancing support of X2go/LDAP? Or do you   
just want to administrate users in LDAP.

For the latter, I personally recommend setting up your LDAP tree   
manually (there are plenty of howtos in the web for this...). For   
learning LDAP this should be your way to go. Then make sure you can   
use LDAP as libnss and pam source for passwd, group, shadow. At last   
you have to make sure that LDAP users are in the x2gousers group   
(which can be local or also a group in LDAP).

Once you have that, LDAP users can login via X2go.

[Once you have such a simple LDAP DIT up and running you might want to  
  start from scratch and set up an LDAP-server that gets administered  
by  GOsa² or CIPUX ;-) ...]

If you want to use load balancing with X2go, then this should also be   
possible manually, but basically that's what the scripts were intended  
  for (they were also intended for easy LDAP-setup, but you can do  
this  manually...). However, to my personal view, the LDAP  
implementation  needs quite some work before the Baikal release and  
also needs proper  documentation of the way LDAP data is used and  
interpreted...

Maybe someone else has experience on LDAP/loadbalancing...

Greets,
Mike


-- 

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen
fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419

GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B
mail: mike.gabriel at das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/attachments/20110323/f1016ee9/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/attachments/20110323/f1016ee9/attachment-0001.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/attachments/20110323/f1016ee9/attachment-0002.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/attachments/20110323/f1016ee9/attachment-0003.pgp>