[X2Go-Dev] Proxy versus broker?

[Mike Gabriel]

Hi John,

On Fr 28 Sep 2012 14:46:14 CEST "John A. Sullivan III" wrote:

> Hello, all.  I was delighted to see the pending release of proxy
> capability.  Is this at all related to the project undertaken quite a
> while ago to create a "broker", i.e., to have a single publicly exposed
> site to which users would connect and then be directed to their
> appropriate X2Go Server?

Same here...

> We currently struggle with assigning unique X2Go servers (and we use one
> per user via VServer) unique ports to avoid consuming countless public
> IP addresses.  It would be so much easier of all could connect to a
> single device and have that device broker the connection to their
> internal X2Go Server.  Thanks - John

Yes, the scenario you describe will be possible. The process of  
providing this code for the public can be accelerated by contracting  
Alex and/or me to work on that code with priority.

Currently, a lot of X2Go development still happens ,,after work''.

Greets,
Mike


-- 

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabriel at das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
URL: <http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-dev/attachments/20120928/2b7e5370/attachment.pgp>